|
out this article before reading. Since this contains a lot of information, printing it out first will help you read and evaluate the material more effectively. |
![]()
Planting our stake in the ground -- a "Manifesto of Truth"
|
One of the purposes for this article is to introduce the doctrinal foundation and philosophy of Rising Bread Ministries (i.e., to describe really "who we are"). However, the purpose of "meeting and greeting" is only a secondary reason for this article. It is far more important to understand the Biblical truth we are introducing here than it is to understand Rising Bread Ministries. Therefore, the primary purposes for this article are: 1) to encourage you to go back to the Holy Scriptures and interest you in further study; and 2) to help you be more aware of and properly alarmed by the seriously-false, dangerous teaching running rampant through the modern Christian church, so you will better know how to respond when you encounter it.
While this will only be a summary introduction and not a detailed treatise and study of all the issues, it should still provide enough information for you to have a firm understanding of our basic positions and why we take such strong stances on the issues. Having such an understanding of our values and methods will help you more effectively evaluate the information we publish and hopefully put it to good use in your own life, family, and church.
|
P.S. - Why you may want to read this article |
Usually, a "P.S." is put at the end of something written, but we're using it here instead because it means "Pre-Script" (before the writing) in this case instead of "Post-Script" (after the writing). We're also using "P.S." to stand for several reasons you may be interested in reading the rest of the article. We believe the reasons for reading further are all core, God-given values each person seeks and protects. Through the information presented in this article, we hope in some way to help you meet these basic needs in your life. We see these values as the following:
|
P.S. - Personal Significance Everyone needs to know they are really important and their life is not useless and insignificant. If you have ever had a question about what you and your life are worth, this article is for you. |
|
P.S. - Personal Security Everyone needs to be safe physically, mentally, and spiritually. The information here cannot protect you physically, but it can go a long way in adding to your overall spiritual and mental security. |
|
P.S. - Personal Satisfaction It is an obvious statement to say, "Enjoying life is good." But the world is filled with people who don't really know what it's like to have personal satisfaction, contentment, joy, or peace. If you're one of those people and long for more substantial fulfillment in your life, please read on -- we have some important truths to share with you. |
|
P.S. - Personal Survival Every person's basic instinct throughout most of life is to avoid death. And even if they reach the end and no longer want to live, most people still would like to be remembered well by others. Above all, every human is born with an instinctual longing for eternal life, a desire to never really die. In this regard, this article is especially for you. |
|
|
|
Rising Bread Ministries is an association of Christians committed to caring for spiritual needs in the Christian church, the Body of Christ. We are mutually dedicated to performing this role by:
Correctly and faithfully communicating God's unique, explicitly revealed, and absolute truth, which is found only in the Bible
Helping individual Christians know and understand God's will and character through learning how to better study the Bible and therefore learning how to hear directly from God personally
Equipping Christians with practical tools of Biblical knowledge to encourage them to follow Christ daily and thus achieve God's will for their lives
Exposing modern, heretical teachings in the church that are both attacking the faith of individual believers and are threatening the very identity and function of the church at large
Encouraging unity in the true universal church (the Body of Christ) -- such unity can be achieved solely on the grounds of objective, understandable truth from the Holy Scriptures, our mutual love for Christ, and the unifying work of the Holy Spirit, and on those grounds alone.
|
You were
running a good race. Who cut in on you and kept you from obeying the
truth? That kind of persuasion does not come from the one who calls you.
"A little yeast works through the whole batch
of dough." I am confident in the Lord that you will take
no other view. The one who is throwing you into confusion will pay the
penalty, whoever he may be. |
We therefore must take an adamant position of resistance against the many contemporary pressures for the church to transform itself into a more socially "relevant" and attractive organization. We will not sacrifice the absolute and unchanging tenets of core Biblical teaching, regardless of whether other church leaders say this is what is needed, in order to presumably transform the Christian church into something more attractive or relevant to the general public. We strongly believe the Bible is already relevant to today's society and to our own lives, and we believe the revelation of God's truth to mankind has not changed and will never change. So we will instead try to encourage the church to resist these social calls to its "evolution", especially the pressures to change our positions on the basic, absolute doctrines of the Bible.
In all our efforts, we hope we can encourage fellow Christian believers to learn how to better and practically apply the unchanging and eternal truths of the Holy Scriptures to their own lives and to the world around them. We intend to communicate the unchanging message of God's love that is clearly shown in the Bible. We will deliver God's messages from the Scriptures without diluting, softening, or changing them to supposedly make them more socially acceptable or attractive. We also strongly desire to help fellow Christians do the same within their own sphere of influence.
|
What does the term "Rising Bread" mean? |
The concept of "Rising Bread" refers to Christ's and the apostles' use of that idea when warning about false religious teachings. The reason they used the metaphor of yeast (or "leaven") in their warnings is that mixed-in yeast is not initially visible or obvious, but over time it permeates and affects the whole loaf. A popular notion many believe is that we should be liberal by tolerating the possibility of some degree of significant error mixed in with good teaching, presumably because there may be good overall. And besides, aren't we supposed to avoid judging others? Supposedly to communicate open-mindedness, wisdom, tolerance, or humility, we are told by many to just "eat the meat and spit out the bones" or "separate the wheat from the tares" (Matt. 13:24-30), or the old standard "don't throw the baby out with the bath water". But the teaching of the Bible does not give Christians such a simplistic option when it comes to the issue of essential, core doctrines of belief, especially the most fundamental doctrine of the authority of God's Word. God therefore warns all believers to avoid all false teaching, in whatever manner it presents itself and however popular or attractive that may be. Christ's specific warning about this issue to His disciples and to all of us is seen in the following Bible passage:
And the disciples came to the other side of the sea, but they had forgotten to bring any bread. And Jesus said to them, "Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." They began to discuss this among themselves, saying, "He said that because we did not bring any bread." But Jesus, aware of this, said, "You men of little faith, why do you discuss among yourselves that you have no bread? Do you not yet understand or remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets full you picked up? Or the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many large baskets full you picked up? How is it that you do not understand that I did not speak to you concerning bread? But beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees." Then they understood that He did not say to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees [the religious leaders].
Matthew 16:5-12 NAS
|
|
False Christian teaching does not need to blatantly and obviously lie to achieve its aims. It only needs to shift our allegiance and attention away from the Bible to rightly deserve the label of "heresy". |
Heretical teaching in the Christian church has lately taken the form of a more clever, "modernized" blend of a smattering of Biblical truth, humanistic philosophy, and even mystical practices of meditation or special "divine" revelation. This mixture of doctrines and ideas is often so subtly blended together and attractively presented as to not be easily recognizable or obviously different from pure truth. So God's use of the term "yeast" is the best concept when detecting false religious messages, and Christians must avoid such deception entirely. We must not place undue trust in the reliability of what we initially might deem "good" and supposedly throw out the "bad". Rather, if the yeast is there, the whole loaf is corrupted and ruined, and it must be thrown out. If truly false teaching on significant doctrinal issues is being promoted as an ongoing pattern, that entire body of teaching should be completely mistrusted and avoided. If a Christian teacher or organization is either presenting or tolerating such heresy, they should be brought into question and corrected by proper, Biblically-aligned church authority.
All false Bible teaching basically promotes the same heresy by attempting to minimize, change, embellish, modernize, redirect, explain away, over-simplify, or supersede the orthodox doctrines of the Bible. A more subtle form of error is that the teaching has the general and overall effect of simply distracting from the authoritative, complete, relevant and inerrant nature of the Scriptural text itself. Whatever form of teaching is false, it is most fundamentally false because it can be shown to be significantly at variance with the clear principles and commandments spelled out in God's Holy Scripture. Such teaching therefore has the effect of undermining the authority of the Bible.
There are some primary reasons we are keenly aware of and concerned about false teaching in the church:
On the basis of compelling and objective evidence, we believe the Bible is God's personal revelation to all of mankind.
We ourselves study the Holy Scriptures.
We love Christ and therefore love His Body, the Christian church.
We have long-term experience both in the church and with studying the writings of historical and modern religious teachers.
We have observed that seriously-false teaching is widely accepted in the modern church.
Both the Bible and our own experience tell us that such heresy is destructive to the lives and spiritual health of individual Christians and to the church at large.
In all these matters, our view of the difference between "orthodoxy" and "heresy" is primarily driven by our study of the Scriptures and our personal relationship with the Author. We have been increasingly grieved over the years by our growing awareness of the spread and popularity of seriously false teaching in the church, which is causing spiritual damage on a mass scale, according to the Biblical description of these issues and as observed in our personal experience. We therefore sincerely hope you are one who will "endure sound doctrine" (2 Tim. 4:1-5), which we are attempting to present in this article. So we ask that you carefully read what we are saying here and compare it against Holy Scripture, as the Bible encourages us to do:
Now these were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so. Therefore many of them believed, along with a number of prominent Greek women and men.
Acts 17:11,12 NAS
|
| Our motives and method of communicating arise from a sincere love for Christ, His Word, and a love for others. We must therefore stand up for the truth out of obedience to Christ's clear commands and allow Holy Scripture to speak for itself. If this is offensive to some people, then so be it. We are committed to serving their true needs, whether or not they realize it. |
Our basis of authority is the Bible. Because we love Christ, we are committed to an ongoing struggle to obey what He told us to do. His Word, the Bible, contains various commandments to all believers. God has given all Christian believers some very clear instructions, which we are required to obey. We have added italics to the verses that speak most directly to God's commandments in this regard:
I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by His appearing and His kingdom: preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths. But you, be sober in all things, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.
2 Timothy 4:1-5 NASFor though we walk in the flesh, we do not war according to the flesh, for the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of fortresses. We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ, and we are ready to punish all disobedience, whenever your obedience is complete.
2 Corinthians 10:3-6 NASDear friends, although I was very eager to write to you about the salvation we share, I felt I had to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints. For certain men whose condemnation was written about long ago have secretly slipped in among you. They are godless men, who change the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord.
Jude 1:3-4 NIVDon't have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. And the Lord's servant must not quarrel; instead, he must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful. Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will.
2 Timothy 2:23-26 NIVBut flee from these things, you man of God, and pursue righteousness, godliness, faith, love, perseverance and gentleness. Fight the good fight of faith; take hold of the eternal life to which you were called, and you made the good confession in the presence of many witnesses. I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who testified the good confession before Pontius Pilate, that you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ, which He will bring about at the proper time -He who is the blessed and only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords,
1 Timothy 6:11-15 NASFor what have I to do with judging outsiders? Do you not judge those who are within the church?
1 Corinthians 5:12 NAS
Throughout this process, we will not and cannot apologize to anyone who might accuse us of being "judgmental" just because they may be offended by the plain Biblical message we present. It is our firm understanding from Scripture that we cannot possibly express love and truth to others by observing a fear that someone will be put off by the message of God's Word. So by quoting and applying His truth correctly, even though by doing so we could be viewed by some as being over-confident, arrogant, naive', puritanical, backwards, or unduly authoritative, we will just rely on the authority of the clear statements presented in Scripture, to which we are primarily accountable. As Martin Luther said when he was being interrogated before the inquisition of the Diet of Worms:
"Unless I am convinced by sacred Scripture or by evident reason, I cannot recant because my conscience is held captive by the Word of God, and to act against conscience is neither right nor safe. Here I stand. God help me. I can do no other."
Our motives and method of communicating arise from a sincere love for Christ, His Word, and a love for others. We must therefore stand up for the truth out of obedience to Christ's clear commands and allow Holy Scripture to speak for itself. If this is offensive to some people, then so be it. We are committed to serving their true needs, whether or not they realize it.
Finally, we have no loyal following or group that we are compelled to placate, entertain, or otherwise satisfy. Rather, we must obey what the Spirit of Christ has clearly instructed in order to serve the Biblically-described spiritual needs of all Christians. We will therefore endeavor to do so strictly under Scriptural authority.
|
To lay the doctrinal foundation for our "Manifesto of Truth" in this article, we must first emphasize that Rising Bread Ministries recognizes and strongly affirms the following self-evident attributes of the Bible, in the form of its original manuscripts, verified copies, and faithful translations. By "self-evident attributes" we mean the qualities of the Bible displayed in its own text which become readily evident through a study of the original Scriptures, their history, and their various accurate translations.
|
#1 - Specially Revealed by God The Bible (the "Holy Scripture") is the only written, objective, comprehensible, and available form of God's direct revelation of universal truth to all of mankind. The Scripture is in addition to, completely agrees with, and is affirmed by the person of Jesus Christ and by the factual record of nature (the created universe). The revelational truths from Jesus Christ are included in the Bible in addition to details of His life, purpose, and actions. Historical evidence further corroborates the Biblical record of Jesus. This special revelation of God through the Holy Scriptures has been written in human language, and its authors were directly instructed and inspired by God. The words God employed, through His human agents, are adequate to reveal His purposes, character, will, commandments, and other linguistic expressions of His meanings. Therefore, the Bible is God's personal and specific revelation to all of mankind which expresses objective, adequate and understandable meanings in human language. |
|
#2 - Authoritative The Bible clearly shows that God intended to reveal Himself to us, and He intended for the Scriptures to act as our final authority in all matters of truth, faith, and practice. God recognizes the Scriptures as reflecting His own authority directly, and therefore He holds us personally accountable for knowledge of and obedience to His special revelation, the Bible. |
|
#3 -
Inerrant The Bible, in its original manuscripts (the "autographa"), is free of any error whatever, although human authors wrote it under God's inspiration and regardless of whether human sin or wrong thinking was recorded in it. The Scriptures are completely accurate in all the facets of God's special revelation, including factual truth such as the identity of its authors, their culture, their language, and all mentioned aspects of history and science. Although we can often observe scientists and theologians to be at odds, we can also see that the record of nature and the text of the Bible are in complete harmony. Both science and theology are man's interpretation of truth and therefore arise from human, fallible thinking. However, both the record of nature and the teachings of the Bible are simply factual. Since both these sets of facts come from the same source (both originate from God), they do not and even cannot contradict each other. The Bible consistently stands the test of lower-level, textual criticism regarding its origin and authorship, the integrity of its various original-language manuscripts, and the accuracy of the existing copies. Because of the overwhelming evidence for the preservation of textual accuracy in these manuscripts, with the effect that we can be assured the original meanings of the Bible have been faithfully preserved, certain reliable Scripture translations are now available in modern languages. As a result, faithful Scripture translations exist which accurately preserve the intended meanings of the original Biblical writings to such an extent of reliability that the modern Christian can be assured they literally hold the Word of God in their hands. However, Bible translations are also subject to intense textual analysis and scrutiny, since no modern translational effort, nor its results, can be regarded as directly "inspired" or "instructed" by God in the way the original writings were directly inspired. Therefore, only to the extent that these modern translations faithfully present an accurate rendition of the original-language manuscripts are they also to be considered inerrant or infallible. A corollary to this is that, even though certain faithful Bible translations can sometimes be shown to contain minor, non-doctrinal errors, the presence of these few and minor errors does not in any way significantly diminish the general authority of these translations or make them either untrustworthy, inapplicable or unusable to the modern Christian. Minor variations between reliable translations have been identified; however, such differences do not deal with basic doctrinal issues. For example 1 Peter 1:10,11 in the New American Standard translation reads:
The New International Version instead reads:
To quote the Bible scholar and translator Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., on the issue of these particular variations: "I strongly affirm that the prophets claimed ignorance only on the matter of time ... Scholars err badly when they translate the Greek phrase ['what time or what manner of time'] as if it meant 'what [person]!' The Revised Standard Version [RSV], the New American Standard Bible [NAS], the Modern Language Bible [MLB], and the New English Bible [NEB] are definitely incorrect here. It is a grammatical impossibility! The passage teaches that these men were most aware of what they were writing." Careful study and comparison of the various translations of these passages shows that the error in the NAS, RSV, MLB, and NEB translations is actually minor -- it does not deal with a significant doctrinal issue. These kinds of slight errors in modern translations are not doctrinally significant, although they should be corrected in subsequent publications. Therefore, such seldom and minor errors which can sometimes be found in reliable translations do not detract from their general doctrinal authority or their usefulness to the common Christian as a source of truth for faith and daily practice. |
|
#4 -
Infallible The Bible (in its original form) is absolutely trustworthy and reliable. It is above and beyond general skepticism, is exempt from liability to error, and is immune from any possibility of fallacy. The original text of the Bible is not subject to any human's "higher criticism" which presumes a likelihood of unreliability or error. |
|
#5 -
Immutable Constant and unchangeable - the Bible's text and therefore its teachings have not, do not, and cannot significantly change over time. It has not been and cannot be fundamentally corrupted. |
|
#6 -
Individually
Comprehensible The Bible is generally knowable and understandable to common believers, not requiring any specially-advanced, human interpretation of essential doctrines. That is, the general believer is able to correctly interpret Scriptural teachings in all areas of core belief. Most especially, such correct interpretation takes the form of understanding and believing God's over-arching message of redemption from sin and eternal reconciliation to Him, as seen in the Biblical doctrine of salvation exclusively through His Son Jesus Christ (i.e. the "Gospel of Christ"). Although teachers in the church are necessary for more advanced topics to foster spiritual maturity, they are not necessarily required to convey basic, essential doctrine. Although authentic discipleship is shown to usually happen in a Biblically-based church environment, each believer is able to be individually taught by the Holy Spirit through personal Bible study on all issues fundamental to faith, salvation, and discipleship. In addition, even unbelievers can understand the meaning of the Gospel, the good news of Christ's salvation. The Holy Spirit's direct intervention is necessary for them to be able to apply it to themselves (to exercise true faith). Even for an unbeliever in the preliminary process of coming to a point of salvation, gaining an understanding of the Biblical Gospel message does not require a human teacher to explain it in detail. It may just need someone to relay the Biblical message of the Gospel clearly. |
|
#7 -
Practically Relevant The Bible has practical value to our lives in all matters of faith and daily practice; the Bible's doctrines are not obsolete, nor can they become irrelevant. Holy Scripture has not been outmoded by modern human philosophy. We can (and must) use Biblical teaching as a guide for and authority over our day-to-day lives. |
|
#8 -
Externally Objective The Bible does not require or even allow for personal, subjective reinterpretation of its messages. Rather, it is an independent body of truth generally able to "speak for itself" (i.e., on most issues, especially on essential doctrines, the Bible does not need human wisdom or individual experience to explain its meaning or reveal any presumably "hidden" truth). Regarding the issue of our individual experience, although it is very appropriate to illustrate how to apply Scriptural truth to one's daily life, the situational application of truth (its personal relevance) is distinctly different from its independent, objective meaning. Modern authors and teachers often make a serious mistake when they equate the personal application of Biblical truth with its meaning. These two concepts (meaning vs. relevance) must not be confused. If someone confuses the process of Bible interpretation with personal application, they will often misunderstand the Scriptural meanings and will thus render practical application impossible! For example, a common error in group Bible study occurs when the broad question is asked of the group, "What does this verse mean to you?" Or, "What do you get out of this Scripture?" Such questions usually are only interested in understanding personal applications or private interpretations -- they are not necessarily interested in what the Bible actually means. Distinguishing between personal application and the correct interpretation is not optional -- the two concepts are definitely not the same. Personal views about the relevance of truth are highly subjective and are open to private interpretation, misunderstanding, and therefore misapplication. The actual meanings of Biblical truth are objective and independent of personal relevance. Scriptural truth, if properly interpreted, will imply and encourage one or more personal applications. But the truth objectively and independently stands on its own, regardless of how it may relate to an individual. How someone might apply the Biblical truth to themselves does not tell anyone what the Bible actually says. Only by first differentiating between Scriptural meanings and their personal applications will Christians be able to properly interpret and apply the Word of God to their lives. |
|
#9 -
Uniquely Exclusive
and Complete Only the Bible contains objective, authoritative, verifiable, trustworthy, and complete doctrinal truth from God; no other teaching is totally reliable. No other "revelations" or "truths" (external to the Bible) presented as fundamental positions of faith or practice are either needed or are to be trusted -- they do not come from God and are directly condemned and excluded by God. They represent overall concepts that directly oppose God's truth. Examples of such extra-Biblical, erroneous, and deceptive texts include the Qur'an (Koran), the Book of Mormon, the Jehovah's Witness New World Translation, the Catholic Apocrypha, the Buddhist Tripitaka, the various Hindu scriptures (Bhagavad Gītā, etc.), and other such notable representations of heretical teaching. God has already revealed and finalized His written truth in the form of the Holy Bible. Any other representations of doctrinal truth are untrustworthy and fundamentally evil. The God of the Bible is the sovereign and exclusive originator, interpreter, arbiter, and ultimate eternal judge of all truth. Spiritual doctrines embodied in any teaching that significantly contradict God's Word are only blasphemous counterfeits. |
|
#10 -
Eternal Scriptural Truth will never cease to exist; it will eternally retain all its original characteristics and fundamental nature. This eternal Truth is synonymous with and inseparable from Christ Himself. |
|
if you don't have time to read anything else. We believe the information here will be the most valuable to you. |
|
In various places throughout this article, we refer to "essential" or "core" doctrines. It is necessary to be clear about what we mean when we use those terms so you will understand what we are saying. A summary of how we use the term "essential (or core) doctrine" is:
Essential
(or core) doctrine: Any
statement of fact from the Bible necessary for belief in order to
fulfill God's will for mankind:
Note: An "essential belief" is a belief in an essential doctrine. However, in most contexts it is appropriate to use the terms "essential belief" and "essential doctrine" interchangeably. |
The Bible clearly states that all humans (in their natural, sinful condition) will suffer the "second death" of the eternal lake of fire if they are not born again; they will "die in their sins" and perpetually be in a state of damnation and punishment. The first purpose of the Bible is to fulfill God's will by revealing Himself to mankind in order that as many as possible will be saved, as the Scripture tells us:
The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.
2 Peter 3:9 NASFor God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.
John 3:17 NAS
The Holy Scriptures are the most objective, clear expression of God's love remaining on the Earth. This life and love has been embodied in God's "only begotten" Son, Jesus Christ, and the Bible "testifies of Him". We therefore view the over-arching and primary purpose of the Bible as communicating God's love to humans by revealing the Gospel of Jesus Christ, His "good news" of eternal salvation.
We can observe from the Bible that the second purpose of the Scriptures is to cause us, after being born again through a true belief in Christ, to grow "in Him", (i.e. to spiritually mature), as the Bible says:
All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.
2 Timothy 3:16,17 NAS
This is the process of Christian discipleship, and this process is directly commanded by Christ for individual believers and for the church at large. Discipleship is so important that the Scriptures bind this process inseparably with salvation, and Jesus commanded the church to both "preach the gospel" and to "make disciples of all nations". With these overall Scriptural principles in mind, we present the following list of Biblical doctrines as being "essential" to salvation and spiritual growth (discipleship):
Doctrines necessary for Christian discipleship
God's character, revelations, and intentions
Jesus Christ and His Body, the church
Commandments for all believers
|
|
In studying the overall body of teaching
presented in the Scriptures, we can readily observe certain characteristics
common to all sound, orthodox Biblical instruction.
All of these qualities show that the primary focus of good Bible
teaching is on God, His holy
character, and His authority (i.e., good Bible teaching inevitably
focuses on Christ and the Bible).
Sound teaching repeatedly refers to and relies on the authoritative, objective,
and comprehensible statements of God's Word instead of
appealing to a human's insight, higher education, charisma,
intelligence, or personal experience.
Consider the following list of the characteristics of good Biblical
teaching, which are illustrated in the Scriptures:
|
|
If you want to learn how to identify
false teaching, make it your primary priority to get intimately familiar
with the genuine article. ... it is much easier to know the truth as a means for detecting error than it is to become an expert on sin. The best way to recognize a counterfeit is to know the real thing first. |
|
Heretical (unorthodox) teaching consistently lacks some or all of the above characteristics of good Biblical instruction. Its focus is rather on the human teaching or on the teacher, not on the Bible or on Christ Himself. Erroneous spiritual instruction either uses Scripture very little or very superficially, it contradicts or "twists" Scripture, it adds new "truths" to the Scriptural message, it ignores Scripture entirely, or it simply distracts from the Biblical truths. The overall effect of heretical teaching is to communicate to the learner something other than what the Bible shows God intended or something other than what He has already said. Such false teaching only creates followers of a human teacher or loyal fans of a "teaching fad". It does not (and cannot) produce authentic disciples of Christ because it is fundamentally false.
Before we continue further, let's first be clear on the meaning of the word "heresy". Here's how it is defined:
her·e·sy [ˈhɛrəsi]
1. opinion or doctrine at variance with the orthodox or accepted doctrine, esp. of a church or religious system.
2. the maintaining of such an opinion or doctrine.
3. [relating to the] Roman Catholic Church: the willful and persistent rejection of any article of faith by a baptized member of the church.
4. any belief or theory that is strongly at variance with established beliefs, customs, etc.
(heresy. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved March 05, 2010, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/heresy)
[Italics added]
Our use of the term "heresy" (and its other word forms, such as "heretical") follows definitions 1 and 2 above. The "orthodox or accepted doctrine" we will refer to is the correctly-interpreted text of the Bible (from original-language manuscripts, verified copies, and/or faithful, accurate translations). Furthermore, we have observed that any spiritual teaching which contradicts, misuses, supersedes, or modifies the meaning of Scriptural text, as a regular practice, must be identified as "heresy". This application of the term "heresy" is what we are doing both in this article and in other writings. So before you become offended by our regular usage of these terms in identifying false teaching, please refer to the actual word definition and its correct application. To summarize our application of these word meanings, we will treat and use the terms "heretical teaching" and "heresy" in the following manner:
Heretical teaching, or "heresy": any teaching represented as Christian instruction that communicates meanings which significantly differ from the Biblical meanings, where such verifiable differences occur as a pattern in the teaching, in that they are regularly and repeatedly presented. Teaching should be identified as heresy when it can clearly be shown to repeatedly vary from a responsible and correct interpretation of the Scriptures. Bodies of so-called Bible instruction that regularly violate an accurate interpretation of Holy Scripture are therefore to be treated as "heresy" or "heretical teaching". Interpretive violations include contradiction, distraction, misapplication, omission, replacement, modification, expansion, or any other verifiable and recurring form of departure from the originally-intended meaning of the Biblical text.
Please note: A correct use of the terms "heretical teaching" or "heresy" does not necessarily apply to Biblically-based works which make occasional mistakes in interpreting Scripture. However, when such errors are identified, they should be promptly corrected, with the overall goal of rendering all parts of a Christian work as free as possible of any interpretive violations of Scripture, either in meaning or in application. Such ongoing corrective action should be applied to any human effort, including modern Bible translations or paraphrases, when such works are clearly shown to contain interpretive violations. If a Biblically-based teaching, Bible translation, or Bible paraphrase remains perpetually static after its significant doctrinal errors are clearly identified, and no corrective action is taken, the value of that work will be greatly diminished, to the point of possibly rendering the entire work untrustworthy and therefore useless. In this case, more reliable teachings or translations should be used in place of the unchanging, erroneous work.
Before examining the Scripturally-based guidelines for recognizing the tell-tale earmarks of heretical teaching, we should first note that if any human teaching about spiritual concepts significantly deviates from Scripture as a general practice, that teaching is exalting itself as an authority over God's Word. It must therefore be treated as dangerous heresy and avoided. The following rules of thumb for recognizing heresy therefore stem from the premise of supreme respect and honor for the Biblical text.
We must also stress the following principle -- If you want to learn how to identify false teaching, make it your primary priority to get intimately familiar with the genuine article. In reading the following section about heretical teaching tactics, you will notice that it is somewhat long and drawn out (even though the section is only a brief summary), as compared to the much shorter section above about the characteristics of good Biblical teaching. The reason for this size difference is that it is much simpler to understand and describe the truth than it is to comprehend and explain all the varieties of error. God has revealed His truth to us in a form that is generally straightforward to understand. So although it is certainly helpful to study the tactics used to promote heresy, it is more useful to simply understand the plain truth God communicates to us in the Scriptures. Therefore, when reading the following guidelines, please also consider the following "rule of thumb" -- it is much easier to know the truth as a means for detecting error than it is to become an expert on sin. The best way to recognize a counterfeit is to know the real thing first.
|
|
Tactic #1 - Expandable
Truth The Bouncy, Inflatable Fun House If the teaching embellishes or expands upon Biblical truth to further its own points, it is untrustworthy and false. Such embellishment is often done by going beyond mere application of the existing Bible text and instead stretching the truth, presumably to make the teaching more interesting, enjoyable, understandable, or acceptable. Such enlargement of the truth usually takes the form of adding to the truth of the Biblical text by supplying other principles of "truth" not clearly shown in the text or by illustrating life applications or private interpretations not supported by the Scriptures quoted. If a teacher makes a regular practice of embellishing and expanding upon the statements of Scripture and presents their own private speculations as the "truth", their teaching is false and should be generally mistrusted. Many Christian authors or ministry leaders seem to regularly obey some sort of overpowering compulsion to present their own private interpretation of the Scriptures. They add their own personal applications, anecdotes, and viewpoints onto the Biblical text to explain the points they are trying to make. But in the process of supplying their "added insight", they often either warp or greatly expand the plain meanings depicted in the context of the Bible passages they quote. In examining the many examples of such interpretive violations we have witnessed, we can only come to one conclusion about why these distortions so regularly occur: such teachers want to convey a special message to their audience, and they will expand or distort the Biblical message in whatever way is needed to communicate their own meanings. We therefore strongly urge each Christian, when reviewing the teachings of any church leader or popular author, to carefully look at the Scripture to see if what they are saying is actually true (Acts 17:11). |
|||
Bait and Switch - the Shell Game If the teaching has the effect of shifting loyalty or focus away from the Bible and toward the teacher or their own message, it is false. This falsification is often seen by the predominance of the teacher's words alongside only minimal or even no Scripture, especially when the message is delivered by a popular, dynamic, or exciting leader. The current thinking seems to be, "For best results, just read a best-selling author." An especially troubling expression of this heresy tactic is seen in the behavior of those teachers who practice "Tactic #10 - Apostles and Prophets". In this age of superstars and hero-worship, it is all too easy to be attracted to the charisma of someone who is perceived to be a great leader, especially when such a person makes us feel good about ourselves, tells us what what we naturally want to hear, or represents to us an ideal we would like to personify. Focusing on such self-centered desires instead of on God Himself is what the Bible plainly labels as "idolatry", and if we claim to love and belong to Christ, we should care deeply about this concern. Christian believers should worship God alone, strictly out of love for and gratitude to Christ Jesus. When a popular teacher places emphasis on themselves through their own personal charm and dynamic or exciting style, we must recognize this false emphasis for what it actually is -- a temptation to worship an idol. Our focus should be fixed on Christ and God's Word alone, not on someone else who embodies our selfish ideals or somehow holds out a promise of personal fulfillment. Following the "beautiful people" rarely produces beautiful results in our lives. Following Christ alone is the only process whereby we can truly reflect His matchless beauty. |
|||
|
Tactic #3 -
Modern and Easy "Now why didn't I think of that?" If the teaching minimizes, questions, or obscures Scriptural messages by inappropriately "modernizing" or oversimplifying them, the teaching is false. This error is commonly seen in the apparent need for a teacher to rationalize or explain difficult passages to come to a humanly-acceptable resolution, which the Bible itself may not always supply. In other words, the Scripture is not allowed to stand on its own -- in all cases it apparently needs to be propped up by a humanly-acceptable explanation, especially in difficult passages which are "harder to swallow". This is not to say that we shouldn't rely on good Bible teachers to help us better understand difficult passages, either those that are "deep" or those that are seemingly contradicted by other verses. The Holy Spirit makes clear that we have a need for such teachers in the church. Rather, this point about the incessant need for a humanly-acceptable explanation or logical resolution to everything touches on a common problem: the tendency of many teachers to essentially change or obscure the meaning of Scripture in order to present a simple explanation that people will more easily accept or enjoy. Some parts of Scripture are difficult, and they can be understood only through detailed Bible study, proper teaching, and spiritual maturity. Also, certain teachings of the Bible are just harder to accept. For example, many Christians believe they are perpetually and unconditionally in a state of forgiveness of their sins by God. However, Christ clearly disagreed in His teaching about prayer, when He said, "For if you forgive others for their transgressions, your Heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive others, then your Father will not forgive your transgressions." (Matthew 6:14,15 NAS) Such a teaching may be hard for some believers to accept. It is not hard to understand, however. And this Scripture does not require a human teacher to launch into an explanation of what it means and how it could be true or to offer the evil suggestion that it may not really say what it actually says, in order to make it easier to accept. Rather, what is needed is our obedience; in this case, to forgive others and thus be in a position for our own sins to be forgiven. This is one of many Biblical examples where the teaching is difficult to accept and obey, not difficult to understand. It does not require a teacher; it requires our humble obedience, which is often far more difficult than gaining understanding. Another common form of the "Modern and Easy" fallacy is a consistent attempt to "modernize" the Biblical text by stripping away the Scripture's original meaning and force-fitting each message into a contemporary social context or modern language usage, where it may not be able to adequately fit. As a historical and cultural book, the Bible's messages must be properly viewed through the lens of the history, language and culture contemporary with its authors. If the Bible's original context is stripped away, its truth will also be lost in the process. Overall, if a teacher seems to always have an amazingly simple, contemporary explanation for every Biblical issue, they are likely falling into this trap and their teaching should be generally distrusted and carefully scrutinized against Scripture. |
|||
|
Tactic #4 -
New Paradigms Brave new worlds, where God has never gone before If the teaching attempts to supersede the Bible by presenting supposedly new doctrines or paradigms, it is false. For example, if you hear tag-lines such as "A New Paradigm for Discipleship", "Hidden Truths from God", or "Secrets of the Bible", watch out. You just stumbled across a heresy. A very troubling form of this "New Paradigms" fallacy is further explained in "Tactic #10 - Apostles and Prophets", detailed below. Another example of this heretical tactic, which is especially worth noting separately, is detailed in "Tactic #13 - New Horizons". |
|||
|
Tactic #5 -
Scripture Twisting The Truth is clay, not a rock If the teaching mishandles (misinterprets or misapplies) the Scriptural text as a regular practice, it is false. Such falsification is often accomplished through the isolation of verses from their Biblical context, making their message more flexible and pliable in the hands of the teacher so they can be sculpted to represent whatever meanings the teacher wants to convey. If one looks up the cited verses in their complete context and finds that the teaching has misrepresented the actual meanings of the verses, this clearly indicates that the Scripture has been twisted. In these cases, the teacher obviously relies on the ignorance and blind trust of the students to accept whatever they are saying without taking the time to compare the teaching to actual Scripture (Acts 17:11,12). Twisting of the Scriptures is also accomplished by citing faulty texts, such as unreliable Bible translations or paraphrases (e.g. The Message, The Living Bible, etc.), which may seem to support the teacher's points. Only proven-reliable, accurate Bible translations should be cited as a teaching authority. As a general rule, Bible paraphrases should never be used as a source of reliable truth and they should generally be regarded as worthless. Only authorized, proven-reliable and accurate translations, such as the Revised Standard Version, the New International Version, the New American Standard, and the King James Version should be used as the foundational text for Bible studies or Christian teaching. If paraphrases or highly-questionable translations are used as sources of truth and authority, the teaching must be distrusted. If the teaching either removes Scriptures from their context or quotes from unreliable texts to put forth its private message, thus obscuring or changing the true meaning of the Biblical message, it is false. |
|||
|
Tactic #6 - Bible Jargon "Christian Speak" or "God words" If the teaching superficially uses "God words" by injecting Bible language or Christian-sounding terminology, without correctly using the Scripture, it is false. This error takes the form of human teaching sprinkled with Biblical or church jargon, which could be called "Christian Speak". It may sound like truth, but it is just human teaching. |
|||
Not God-honored, or "But that's how we've always done it" If the teaching stresses "time-honored" human traditions or wisdom supposedly gleaned from personal, subjective experience over the objective statements of the Bible, it is false. A clear example of this error is the heretical teaching of "contemplative prayer", which is a time-honored tradition from past centuries, but which is not at all supported by Scripture. Rather, it directly contradicts both the teachings on prayer by Christ and other Biblical principles about prayer. This is a "textbook example" of heresy. Such expressions of the "Time-Honored" fallacy are further detailed in "Tactic #14 - Personal Experience" below. In a broader and more generally-applicable sense of the concept of tradition, the modern church commonly observes and teaches various time-honored practices not clearly supported by Scripture for Christian believers, including (but certainly not limited to):
As long as church members realize that mere human traditions are not to be treated as "sacred", there is not necessarily a problem. Only when the traditions are dogmatically enforced, and therefore supersede Biblical teaching, are they to be regarded as heresy. The serious problem with mandating traditional religious practices such as these is that they are not required by God for the New Testament church. Nonetheless, they are often taught as "commandments" in the sense that they are presented as mandatory for believers who want to become joined to a particular group. Any contravention of Biblical authority by requiring observance of human traditions represents only human "religion", especially when they are enforced as a condition of church involvement or acceptance by a group. Such practices do not represent the "pure and undefiled religion" described in the Bible (James 1:27). One of the major problems that has historically arisen from dogmatically requiring human traditions is that they have divided Christian believers from each other into distinctly separate "denominational" or "non-denominational" groups. Such groups do not usually cooperate with each other the way Biblical teaching requires for the Body of Christ. The anti-Scriptural disunity that results from enforcing these practices clearly opposes one of the deep passions of Christ, shown when He petitioned the Father for a close, intimate degree of unity between believers and between us and Him, as recorded in the following Scripture passage:
Notice in the above passage that one of Jesus' primary motives for our unity is that "the world may believe that you have sent me." The church cannot obey Christ's commandment for evangelization and cause others to know that God has sent Him without the spiritual unity Christ desired. Human traditions separate people from one another and therefore contradict the passion of Christ for the church's spiritual unity -- a passion for the lost world to believe in Him and be saved. As we have stated, it is necessary to understand that traditions in themselves are not inherently bad as long as they do not clearly contradict the Scripture and are not enforced as required "doctrines". As a primary example of valid traditions, Christ commanded two regular practices for all believers -- the sacraments of baptism at the time of salvation and frequent participation in the Lord's Supper ("Holy Communion", or the "eucharist"). Furthermore, the New Testament tells all believers that they should assemble together regularly as a church body (Hebrews 10:25). And Christ Himself participated in the Jewish traditions of their religious festivals, which were mandated by God in the Mosaic covenant; Jesus observed these festivals as part of His complete fulfillment of the Law of Moses and His deep respect for the Scriptures. But we can see in all these examples that the traditions were clearly in obedience to God's commands in the Scripture. Various human traditions, while not mentioned in the Bible, are in themselves not inherently "sinful", especially when these practices have been closely associated with individual believers' personal faith. For example, although observance of the the birth of Jesus at Christmas and His death and resurrection at Easter are not mentioned in the Bible, these traditions are deeply meaningful and closely associated with the personal faith of most Christians. Romans 14 speaks strongly to the issue of not judging others for their observances of "non-essential" practices, which many Christian believers follow out of personal conviction, arising from a deep feeling of obedience to and worship of God. Therefore, far be it from us to make a general condemnation of all human traditions! Our only rejection of tradition is based on the standard that Christ spelled out clearly -- when human traditions are essentially represented as the commands of God, especially when they separate Christian believers or groups from each other. The "Time-Honored" heresy is an expression of the human tendency to place priority on human preferences and traditions instead of on God's commandments. Observance and teaching of time-honored traditions instead of God's Word was repeatedly the subject of Christ's scathing, public attacks on the religious leaders of His day. The Bible shows clearly that He does not feel any differently about this issue of hypocrisy and heresy now than He did when He walked the Earth. However, centering people's attention on human traditions is clearly an effective tactic for gaining and maintaining a loyal and cohesive following within the various fractured and independent groups of Christian believers. Such spiritual division and contravention of God's Word is clearly condemned by Christ, His appointed apostles, and by other principles in Scripture. Teachings which place higher value on time-honored traditions than on God's commandments, especially those which have the effect of separating Christian believers from one another, are clearly opposed to sound Biblical teachings and are contrary to Christ's expressly-stated desires. In these cases, dogmatic human traditions must be treated as yet another form of heresy. |
|||
|
Tactic #8 -
Cafeteria Line Take what you like, leave the rest If the teaching singles out only certain Scriptures that seem to agree with its points and omits others that apparently contradict them, it presents a false message overall. This could be called "cafeteria-line" heresy. That is, either the teacher, the learner, or both, pick and choose the more attractive, delectable, and affordable parts of the Biblical text and ignore those which seem less palatable or more costly. Such one-sided, imbalanced teachings are clear examples of Scriptural misinterpretation and "commandeering" of the Biblical text to serve the teacher's own purposes. This heretical tactic is a common thread that runs through all other heretical tactics. It resurfaces in all the cases of false teaching, and people seem to be willing to accept any form of falsehood to serve their own desires. This fallacy is simply an expression of the belief that people fundamentally regard themselves as the final authority -- they indulge in the "right" to decide what is good or bad on the basis of their own thinking and desires, and ignore what God actually says about the topic, just because they don't agree with it or are not willing to pay the personal price required to obey it. |
|||
"Open Wide" or "Keep 'Em Comin' Back for More" If the teaching perpetually remains superficial, never delving into the levels of detail the Bible itself presents, and it continues to only give its listeners the simplistic, bite-sized, fun-to-eat chunks they desire, it will invariably have the overall effect of being false. This is not at all to say that elementary teaching is inherently wrong. On the contrary, basic, simplistic doctrine is necessary for spiritually-immature Christians, and the Scriptures describe such teachings as "milk" and clearly shows they have a necessary role in the spiritual growth of the new believer. But Scripture also strongly laments the serious problem of those who always want milk and never desire to eat the "meat", the deeper and more substantial aspects of the knowledge of Christ which the Bible also reveals and ultimately requires of all Christians. Spoon-fed believers will remain stunted and disabled in their knowledge of God and His Word. Because of their very slow or halted spiritual growth, in which they remain largely unchanged, they run the risk of being ineffective and essentially useless in the Body of Christ and even risk failing to fulfill God's purpose for their life, missing out on His reason for saving them in the first place! Teachings that are perpetually limited to "sound bites" of Scripture, which never expound on the details of truth God explains in His Word, do a deeply hurtful disservice to the Christian in the long run. Believers who continue to remain content with brief explanations of the Bible (as long as they are fun and interesting), and are dissatisfied when they don't move along to other subjects at a certain pace, show that they are disinterested in what God really wants to teach them. Therefore, spoon-feed teachings that cater to these impatient, easily-dissatisfied Christians will only have the long-term effect of being false by depriving believers of God's truth in very important areas and keeping them from growing spiritually. This false teaching tactic is closely related to the "Cafeteria Line" tactic in that its emphasis is to maintain the interest of these immature believers by catering to their desire for variety, fun, and ongoing change, presumably so they will not become bored or overly-challenged. This "spoon feed" tactic is another expression of the modern marketing philosophy "Give the customer what they want." To summarize "The Spoon Feed" tactic, bodies of spiritual teaching, whether from local church leadership or from a popular teacher, often keep things at an elementary level. This practice demonstrates deep disrespect for God's Word by ignoring the clear Scriptural obligation for true discipleship in the church. Such discipleship is a necessary process of spiritual growth, and this is directly commanded by Christ as a fundamental purpose for the church. If a body of teaching ignores the need for such growth by perpetually keeping things at an elementary level of "milk" instead of teaching people to eat the "meat", this teaching is contrary to one of the most fundamental purposes of the church as commanded by Jesus -- that is, to "make disciples of all nations, ... teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you." (Matthew 28:18-20) If this pattern of milk-toast doctrine is perpetuated, it will have the effect of limiting a believer's knowledge of and obedience to Christ and will interfere with their Biblically-mandated function in the Body of Christ. Perpetually-elementary teaching will keep church members totally dependent on their leaders and will ensure they will remain spiritually immature, ineffective as Christians, and easily controllable. Is this what legitimate and loving Christian leaders want for the church? More importantly, is this what Christ wants? Of course not. Such violation of Christ's direct command for ongoing discipleship actually represents a heresy -- it is false teaching overall. But it works well for maintaining a loyal following, since they will keep coming back for more and will continue to open wide as they enjoy the never-ending variety of the easy, fun, and non-confrontational spoon feeding routine. |
|||
"I Speak for God" or "Human 'Divine' Authority" If other tactics fail to convince the audience of the supposed validity of the false teacher's message, this technique apparently is thought by some to be sure to succeed. That is, the "humanly divine" teacher simply bills themselves as either a modern-day apostle, a modern-day prophet, or both. If they can somehow convince their audience that they speak for God, independently and authoritatively, they can of course then proceed with their teaching without question, interruption or objection. This has the effect of distracting and diverting their followers from focusing directly on the Bible, instead drawing attention to the teacher's own private "revelation" (Tactic #2 - Redirected Focus). This presentation of independent authority also invariably introduces new concepts never before presented in the Bible (Tactic #4 - New Paradigms). And in all cases of this heretical teaching practice, it also involves the use of "Tactic #5 - Scripture Twisting". We have observed two major problems with the "Apostles and Prophets" tactic:
In light of all the available evidence, it is easy to deduce a reason why the "office" of apostleship or prophecy (as it is commonly touted) is being resurrected in our times, after the Bible has apparently put to rest the need for this office. That is, the reason for the resurfacing of this belief clearly seems to be that the independently-authoritative "Bible" teachers are willing to employ any method they can to obtain and preserve a loyal following of disciples. For whatever reason, these modern "apostles" and "prophets" market themselves as those who directly speak for God. They seem to expect others to believe and follow them strictly on the basis of their claims of authority, special revelation, and divine power, regardless of the clear statements of Scripture which directly oppose their claims. The most deeply grievous and alarming aspect of this particular heresy tactic, as compared with the other tactics cited, is that these independently authoritative teachers are brazenly trying to position themselves in a place above God. Their messages clearly contradict specific Biblical doctrines and therefore attempt to supersede the general authority of Holy Scripture. A parallel example of such contravention of God's authority is illustrated in Lucifer's (Satan's) own behavior throughout pre-history and in human history, including his temptation of Adam and Even in the garden of Eden. The striking similarities between Satan's deceptive tactic and the typical modern apostle's or prophet's behaviors are especially disturbing. The "$60,000 question" then is this: "Why, if someone claims to speak for God, would they contradict His already-revealed Word or attempt to add to it?" If Christian teachers implicitly question God's character or supersede His Word in this way, they obviously are not representing God as they claim to be. They are only serving their own interests. The apostle Peter spoke directly to this issue in 2 Peter chapter 2. This chapter deserves serious consideration as a further demonstration of God's clear warning against such heretical and damnable practices. In summary, it is sufficient to say that the Bible itself speaks volumes on the issue of its holy, "God-breathed", Holy Spirit-inspired qualities, including its supreme authority, inerrancy, and completeness. While the scope of this most fundamental doctrine of the final authority of Scripture is much larger than what we are able to adequately discuss here, there are many very scholarly and well-respected writings available on this subject, some of which are completely understandable by the average Christian. But more important than these subsequent scholarly writings, the Holy Bible itself is clear and understandable on the most essential points, and we should primarily avail ourselves of the resource of God's Word before listening to human teachers. |
|||
"Don't worry -- just be happy" An overriding theme of many bodies of teaching is to appeal to human emotions, specifically those feelings of comfort, peace, and happiness. Many "doctrinal narcotics dealers" in the church communicate the false belief that conflict, fear, uncertainty, insecurity, and confrontation are inherently bad. The ongoing mantra repeated to the audience seems to be "Don't worry -- just be happy." But the problem with teaching that only promotes "positive" feelings and condemns all "negative" feelings is that it directly contradicts the pattern of Scriptural teaching and specifically contradicts or ignores the repeated behaviors of Christ Himself. As an example, we read in the Bible that the initial public message of Jesus' earthly ministry, as He delivered it to the masses, was simple, sharp, and confrontational, when He emphatically proclaimed, "Repent, for the kingdom of Heaven is near." (Matthew 4:17) Scripture shows that Christ believed the first step in teaching people was to confront them with the requirement to repent of their sins. He believed and taught that, without true repentance as the first step in being "born again", one cannot enter into fellowship with God or be a part of the Kingdom of Heaven. Furthermore, the Bible is filled with examples of the urgent need to confront sin in the church and between fellow believers. It is important to observe that Jesus Himself spent more time talking about sin and its deadly consequences than He talked about more pleasant, comfortable issues such as Heaven or solving life's daily problems. But how many sermons are preached from the modern pulpit that passionately call for a real repentance from sin, especially the personal sins of the church members listening? How many popular teachers focus on the issue of personal sin in a truly Biblical manner which convicts the learner of their own failure and rebellion against God? How much emphasis is really placed on our desperate need for God's own righteousness and His holiness? What teachings really "bring it down to earth" by focusing on our own hypocritical and selfish practices? In our observation, very few messages honestly talk about the subject of sin, although Christ obviously thought it was very important. In fact, His very presence on Earth was to address the deadly issue of our sin. If we reject the Biblical message of repentance from sin in favor of a "feel-good" or "felt-needs" gospel, on the basis that such "negative" teaching makes us feel bad, we are in fact rejecting Christ's own message of salvation. The reason the doctrinal narcotics dealers' tactic of false teaching is so successful is because it caters to people's self-focused desires. After all, who wants to feel bad? Isn't it better to feel good? Aren't "bad" feelings evil and "good" feelings more righteous? The Bible clearly shows this simplistic, self-centered thinking to be false. Without the fear, uncertainty, and general torment that results from true conviction of our sins, we will not repent, and as a result, we and others around us will therefore continue to suffer the grave (and even eternal) consequences. Sin in our lives and in the church is a deadly cancer. If it is not adequately addressed in the Biblical manner, it will destroy individuals, families, and the church at large. Toleration of sin is an affront to God's holiness and it makes light of the precious sacrifice of Christ. So the heresy of avoiding this fundamental sin problem, out of fear that preaching about repentance from sin will drive people away from the church, actually drives people away from God and even deprives many of eternal life. Essentially, a focus strictly on "good feelings" represents a false gospel -- it is not "good news" at all. This false, emotionally-based message stands condemned in light of Scripture, and it tramples on the very blood of Christ. |
|||
|
Tactic #12 -
Dominion Now -- "Heaven on Earth" Victory in life vs. Victory in Jesus A theme of much false teaching promoted within the Christian church in modern times is the supposedly "new" message that everyone can experience victory over their life circumstances by simply understanding and using certain "spiritual" principles. Various expressions of this heresy abound in the Christian church, including:
All the principles taught which fall into this "Dominion Now" or "Heaven on Earth" fallacy share a common emphasis -- an appeal to personal, selfish desires. After all, who wouldn't want to perpetually enjoy health, wealth, and general freedom from hardship? Who wouldn't want to experience personal power over all of life's circumstances? Isn't this the "abundant life" Christ talked about? As a short answer, the Scripture clearly demonstrates it is absolutely not what Jesus described as "abundant life". Our life is in Him alone, not in manipulation of our own circumstances to fulfill our wishes. (John 14:6) This heresy, in all of its various forms, clearly violates God's primary commandment -- that we worship Him alone, exclusive of everything else, especially our own understanding and selfish desires. It also patently violates the Scriptural principle of God's independent sovereignty, since He alone possesses power over our life and over the world at large. We cannot be so foolish as to believe that somehow we have the wisdom to know what is best for our lives -- only God does. We also cannot be so naive' as to assume we can exercise "authority" over our circumstances as only God can. And of course, we cannot be so arrogant as to think we can somehow exercise deep "spiritual" faith principles which supposedly God Himself also uses to accomplish miraculous works. As God clearly communicates through this and many other Scriptures:
Nothing is greater than God. He is the source of all truth and all principles, and He answers to nothing and to no one. We are made in His image, but He is not like us. He does not employ "higher" spiritual principles -- He creates, defines, and manipulates them, according to His own wisdom and for His own independent purposes. He is above all and He is The Almighty. We cannot in any way impersonate or "utilize" God's incomparable, holy, and infinite sovereignty. Spiritual teaching about "higher" principles which humans can supposedly use to accomplish the miraculous (like God presumably also does) is nothing other than foolish, anti-Scriptural, and blasphemous arrogance. Such teaching reflects a gross misunderstanding of the Bible and of God's nature and character. God's power and His principles are not tools for humans to manipulate to follow our own whims, just because we are so brash as to believe we know what is best for us and think we too can act like God. Apparently, many people are willing to believe that through our own knowledge and formulaic practices, we are able to impersonate the Almighty and shape our lives and circumstances, independent of His own sovereign power and wisdom. It sounds like we believe we can become "gods" in our own right, doesn't it? Such beliefs much more closely resemble Mormon, New-Age or eastern religious doctrines than they sound like good Biblical teaching. Neither God, "faith", nor spiritual principles can be treated as some sort of "genie in the lamp", where all we have to do is to learn how to rub the lamp in the right way and POOF! our life solution miraculously appears. This is not faith. It is only self-centered idolatry and foolish, dangerous disrespect for the Almighty.
|
|||
A "new paradigm" for evangelization, discipleship, and church growth In recent decades, a historically and uniquely new philosophical movement has surfaced within the Christian church. This new movement has been identified as the Emergent Church, and it is a spinoff, sister movement to yet another modern trend called the "Church Growth Movement". The primary emphasis of the Emergent Church, according to its leaders' own declarations and activities, has been to reshape or reinvent Christianity (and thus promote it to the world) by employing new stratagems for evangelization, discipleship and church growth. These new techniques have been touted as "new paradigms", or brand-new concepts of reality, and the activities of the various organizations and leaders at the forefront of this movement witness the fact that they believe their supposedly innovative tactics are necessary to promote the Christian religion in the 21st century. The following stratagems are being used by the Emergent church to promote their global agenda, which upon careful inspection can be seen for what it is -- dangerous heresy. Close study of their stratagems most reasonably suggests that the Emergent Church is using these methods in an attempt to redefine Christianity at the most fundamental levels. The Emergent Church's tactics include:
These Emergent Church activities in recent decades are well documented, being publicly touted by the prominent individuals and organizations at the center of this coordinated, global initiative. Many prominent church leaders, authors, and philosophers are at the forefront of this world-wide effort. These leaders' public statements, activities, and publications have consistently promoted the idea that a "new paradigm" is viewed as necessary for the church to remain relevant, to become more "effective" in the modern world, and for Christianity itself to even survive as a viable religion. The serious doctrinal problem with these modern, "progressive" philosophies is that in most respects they are blatantly opposed to Scripture. While some of the Emergent Church activities may seem good at first blush, its philosophies flatly contradict some plain Biblical teachings:
The "New Horizons" heresy is well documented in various other published and thoroughly-researched resources, which provide great detail about the history, activities, and theology of both the Emergent Church and the Church Growth movements. Suffice it to say that the picture these new initiatives paint of world evangelization, discipleship, and church growth differs dramatically from what the Holy Scriptures describe. More information on this is available on the "Questionable Teachings" webpage at http://risingbread.org/Articles/Questionable.htm, under the titles "The Market-Driven Church", etc., and these phenomena are well documented in many other web-based and printed publications. In summary, we choose to focus on the picture God has painted and believe that no new paradigm is needed, since He knew all along what mankind requires in order to come into personal fellowship with Him. He sent His Son and established and preserved His written Word to reveal these things to us. We don't need new human wisdom to "enlighten" us differently. |
|||
Reach out with your feelings, or "The Force is with you" The over-arching, post-modern philosophy of reality is that the concept of "truth" is completely relative and that truth can only be realized through private, personal experimentation and experience, if truth even exists at all. This idea has been broadly and consistently promoted in all aspects of modern society, and many Christians have obviously believed in this deceptive idea. This false philosophy, which could be called "relative truth", "personal truth", or "no truth", is actively promoted by the public education system, the mass media, the government, and private corporations. It is even taught in major theological seminaries and preached from many local church pulpits. This lie is presented in various forms, some obvious and some much more subtle. But all forms of this deception are fundamentally opposed to the concrete, well-defined concept of absolute truth from God as presented in the Bible. All heretical teaching tactics are fundamentally based on an acceptance of this falsehood, and all people who fall victim to these tactics do so because they themselves, to a significant extent, have also bought into the deceptive, postmodern concept of "truth". In sharp contrast to this evil and deceptive philosophy, the Bible communicates a basic message -- truth is real, it is absolute, it is unchanging, it is objectively defined and knowable, and it only comes from God. Specifically, the Holy Scripture not only presents itself as God's truth, but it also shows that Christ is both the pure embodiment of truth and that He literally is the "Truth". The Bible in no way teaches us that we can only know the truth through our own personal exploration, experimentation, or experience. On the contrary, Scripture presents truth as an external, objective, and unchanging set of principles and beliefs to which all humans are accountable. It shows that we can know this Truth not through private, subjective experience, but rather through exercising faith in God's independent revelation of truth, most especially through believing in His only begotten Son, Jesus. To illustrate the "Personal Experience" heresy, we observe that various teachings have been promulgated within the church, some even centuries old, which suggest that believers are able to know "truth" only by exploring deep, hidden things through some sort of mystical process of personal peace and enlightenment. One of the more popular, contemporary examples of such heresy is found in the teachings about "contemplative prayer", which is a centuries-old, Catholic mystical tradition of meditation that has resurfaced in recent years within the Protestant church (see the book excerpt "The Subtle Deception of 'Contemplative Prayer'" at http://risingbread.org/Articles/Be Still.pdf). In this particular case, it is suggested to the Christian believer that in order to really "hear from God" and experience His presence and personal peace, one must immerse themselves into a mindless, quiet meditative state by following a proscribed formula for meditation. This heretical philosophy has been resurrected from past centuries of Catholic tradition and is being actively promoted by modern teachers such as Beth Moore, Richard Foster, Dallas Willard, and Max Lucado. As with all other false teaching, the problem with this particular prayer doctrine is that it violates the Scripture, most especially Christ's own principles and instructions for prayer. But more fundamentally, it violates the Scriptural doctrine of God's truth by consigning the significance of true prayer and fellowship with God to something that you can only know through a mystical, personal experience, as opposed to the Christian experience that should result from authentic Biblical prayer. Whatever form of "Personal Experience" heresy is taught, it will embody the concept that one can know and believe in truth only through private exploration, experimentation, and subjective discovery. Such teachings are directly opposed to what God has revealed about the general concept of His specially-revealed truth in the Bible and are especially opposed to the specific embodiment of Truth in the real, historical person of Jesus Christ. |
|||
"Believe what we're telling you, because you can see that we're so good." The term "public benevolence" refers to acts of kindness and caring for individual needs, such as food, clothing, housing, education, etc., done in full view of the public. This section discusses the heretical tactic of "Public Benevolence" and will therefore address a very sensitive issue: since no one can easily question the value of doing apparently-good things for other people, what could possibly be wrong with that? Scripture itself clearly tells us that the Christian faith is useless (unauthentic or lacking real value) without such good works of benevolence. The apostle James emphatically stated, "Faith without works is dead." (James 2:26) Some very worthwhile, prominent Christian ministries have a primary focus of helping others; Compassion International is a great example. Our personal experience with Compassion International has been excellent in all regards, and they overtly promote the gospel of Christ and Biblical discipleship. See the "About Us" page on their website at http://www.compassion.com/about/aboutus.htm. We would especially invite you to read the following pages:
Our long-time personal experience with Compassion International tells us that all the things they claim to believe about their mission, commitment, faith, and principles are actually true, and they deserve Christian's full support. By contrast with Compassion International, there are other public organizations which superficially resemble Christian benevolence efforts. A notable one is Children International. Their name is similar to Compassion International, and even their logo looks somewhat like Compassion's logo. Looking at their website (http://www.children.org), it becomes clear that Children International employs emotionally-based appeals to garner support, including testimonials from celebrities such as Maureen McCormick ("Marsha Brady" from the TV show "Brady Bunch"). Watch her video testimonial on Children International's sponsorship page (http://www.children.org/AChildJustForYouSW2-ChildrenInternational.asp?WT.mc_id=S_Google&RS_ID=2&WT.srch=1). You will see that the message here emphasizes children's faith "in people, in the world, and in themselves". They say nothing about children's faith in God, either in this testimonial or in other areas of their website. Maureen's video testimonial also states, "Your decision to sponsor a child now will change your sponsored child's life forever." The problem with this statement is that Christians have no reason to believe anything eternal ("forever") will be changed about the child's condition because of Children International's efforts. In this regard, we should especially observe that this organization was originally called "Holy Land Christian Mission" (see their history at http://www.children.org/history.asp?sid=B7838A22-70B5-42F4-964E-57CC61864261). The organization was renamed to Children International, and all references to Christ and Christianity are omitted from their website and their promotional materials. Therefore, while on the surface it would appear that Children International is doing "good" things, it is also evident that they are no longer doing these things for Christ's sake. It is also clear they have shifted their emphasis away from the Gospel of Christ and toward human, public benevolence. And finally, they tell you "You are truly a special person", presumably because you give money to Children International. Should Christians think they are a "special person" because they give money to a benevolent organization that has abandoned the cause of Christ and therefore is not also caring for children's real eternal needs? Of course not. So in cases such as these, the Christian should ask, "What could be bad about 'good' works?" The natural tendency is to automatically object to anyone like ourselves who presumes to question the apparent value of benevolence and supposed "kindness"; any such objection is entirely understandable on the surface. In this regard, we must first emphasize our strong conviction that work and giving on behalf of others can be a very good thing. We believe this strongly, and we are regularly occupied with doing such things ourselves, although we will never publicize them. The reason for questioning the value of works done publicly is based on the need to understand the motive for public good deeds and see the bigger picture -- those deeds' broader context. Specifically, the other activities so-called "ministries" engage in are at least as important as their acts of physical care, and even more so. If their other activities are shown to be highly questionable or devoid of any Christian emphasis, we are obligated to wonder why they are involved in public benevolence. We must step back to see the entire picture painted by a ministry's overall efforts. And in many cases, we must also question why "good" works are often done in such a visible, public manner. Directly examining these issues will help us determine the real value of a ministry's acts of public benevolence. We must not make overly-simplistic assumptions about basic value when we see a public effort visibly promoting their good works. As Christians, we must carefully look at the situation more completely before we decide to support them. So let's repeat an overly-obvious statement: certain public organizations do conspicuous things that help people meet their physical needs; in a general sense, this naturally appears to be noble and good. But we can often (and far too often) observe that some organizations portrayed as Christian ministries (or which once depicted themselves as "Christian") publicly advertise their works of benevolence. Some of these organizations regularly violate Scriptural doctrines or ignore Christ's gospel entirely, through the overall messages they convey in their teachings. If significant Biblical violations are clearly demonstrated by the regular practices of so-called "ministries", we should be compelled to critically examine the overall value of such organizations, including the real value of their good works in light of Biblical truth. In this examination process, we must first look at the statements of Scripture that clearly demonstrate "good" works do not (and cannot) in themselves justify or vindicate the wrongness of an overall false Christian message. We must also respect Christ's judgment about the issue of performing benevolence publicly. Along these lines, there are some necessary questions to answer when we see an organization involved in public benevolence but otherwise ignoring the Bible or preaching a false doctrinal message. Such questions include:
These are necessary questions to answer. We read in the Bible that God addressed these concerns directly, as shown in the following Scriptures (emphasis added):
We can readily see in the above Scriptures that God's emphasis for Christian good works is an exclusive focus on Christ and on expressing our love to Him by demonstrating His love to others -- His complete, Biblical form of love. In both these and in other passages, the Bible also shows clearly that humans are inherently unacceptable to God in our naturally sinful condition, and that only God's provision for our righteousness can make us acceptable. In addition, we can also observe from the Bible that Jesus wants our good works to be private whenever possible, seen only by those we directly benefit and seen by God; it should never be our intention for our good works to be visible to others so they can see how "good" we are and therefore earn their admiration and support. If we have such selfish intentions, Christ assures us that our only reward will be the temporary admiration of others. There is no lasting value in this. In short, we cannot show true love for others while violating God's commandments or acting selfishly. Through all of our Christian good works, we should be doing good for others because we are truly impersonating our Master -- "because we are His disciples". By loving others in the way Christ commanded and exemplified, we are actually loving Him, and we are therefore demonstrating His authentic love to others. We are truly acting like Jesus, and we are thus shown to be His disciples. Therefore, neither individuals nor Christian ministries should draw attention to themselves through their good works or presume that such good deeds can either demonstrate or earn any measure of righteousness. According to the Bible, the overall goal of good works must be to "glorify your Father who is in Heaven" (Matt. 5:16), not to attract attention to a human organization or effort. And above all, a Christian ministry must not communicate to the public that good works are any basis for acceptability, either by God or by others. Such a representation would be a false gospel. Jesus' good news of the Gospel is based solely and completely on His redemptive act of sacrifice for all mankind, and He completely opposes the human concept of gaining acceptance through what humans naturally view as "good". Just as important, an unavoidable fact Christians must face when meeting others' personal needs is: without exception, every single person we physically help is still going to die and face God. So in the process of helping them with their temporary, physical requirements, what are we doing to lead them to Christ? Are we presenting them with the true Gospel? Through all our efforts, are we meeting their eternal needs? We must point out that both Scripture and recorded history shows that every person Christ healed, fed, befriended, or even raised from the dead nonetheless eventually ended up dead anyway. Faced with the inevitability of death for all humans, what are Christians really doing to care for others' eternal needs? Is what we do for others done with a real concern for their ultimate destiny? Do we really place value on these eternal realities the Bible says we must, and therefore express real love for those around us? In His brief ministry on Earth, Jesus placed His primary emphasis on repentance from sin and eternal reconciliation with God by exercising faith in Christ. He did not primarily emphasize meeting people's temporary needs. In addition, the Bible shows Christ used His good deeds as a platform for preaching His good news of salvation and motivating others to believe in Him. Looking at Jesus' example and comparing it to others', we should ask questions like: Do Christian ministries that openly publicize their benevolent works consistently preach Christ's true Gospel as Jesus did? Or do they instead present their good works as a badge of authenticity, a supposed proof of their righteousness, to garner and maintain the financial support they claim is required to continue their "work for God"? Through all their efforts, are they meeting people's most basic, eternal needs as the Bible describes them? Truly honest answers to these questions, in light of Scripture, should primarily influence our opinion of a Christian ministry and the real value of its overall messages. Believers in Christ must not be deceived by a superficial demonstration of public good works which lack the validation and substance of the true, eternal Gospel.
Another very important note on this issue -- many non-Christian organizations are regularly involved in public acts of physical care, including the Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, etc. Is there a tangible, Biblical reason for Christians to think their acts of personal kindness will meet others' eternal needs any better than the activities of these Biblically-condemned religious movements and the organizations associated with them? A responsible, Christian answer to this question must be based solely on a Biblical evaluation of whether such acts of benevolence actually meet the eternal needs of others in the process of addressing their temporary, physical requirements. The over-arching Christian emphasis in our personal care for others should be that we are truly loving them by doing the work of authentic evangelism and discipleship, as commanded by Christ for the church (and therefore for all believers). All acts of Christian care must therefore express Christ's genuine love for mankind by fulfilling His primary passions -- salvation and discipleship. Jesus was not (and is not) focused on merely addressing the temporary problems of human life, so that should not be the Christian's primary focus either. Out of love for and allegiance to Christ, all Christian believers should be obsessively preoccupied with demonstrating and preaching His true gospel message of eternal salvation and making "disciples of all nations", as He has told us to do. Out of a sincere motive of love for Christ and for others, Christians should use acts of benevolence as a tangible, forceful tool for preaching the eternal good news of Jesus (in the way the Bible describes the true Gospel). That should be our ultimate agenda. Anything less is nothing more than typical, human works of "righteousness". All of these good works will one day be obliterated and will become meaningless without what is able to validate them, that which God says has eternal value. So some necessary questions to answer in this regard are:
We must also stress the point that just because a Christian ministry makes their acts of kindness very public, this in itself does not invalidate their ministry. Certain Christian efforts which are primarily aimed at caring for the orphans, the widows, the helpless, and the poor clearly exemplify the true religion the Bible describes. Consider a Biblical summary of such true religion:
So in the process of caring for others, does a Christian ministry also keep itself "unstained by the world" by not compromising on Jesus' command to spread His gospel and make disciples? Again, Compassion International is a good example of a Christian effort that is spreading the good news of Jesus by doing like Jesus did -- meeting peoples' personal needs as a platform for introducing them to Christ and helping others learn how to obey Him. Such ministries should be strongly supported. Another vital question to ask when evaluating a Christian ministry's benevolent activities -- Are they doing this to be seen by others (Matthew 6:1-6)? A strong evidence of such a motive is revealed when a very public "Christian" care effort actually omits or distorts the true Gospel of Christ in their overall process. If they do this, their giving to others has no real, lasting benefit and should instead be seen for what it actually is -- a hypocritical, self-serving effort that has only temporary value. Only the pure, Biblical good news of Christ is able to validate the good-works efforts of a Christian ministry; otherwise, such efforts have no lasting or inherent value. In summary, if a public organization which labels itself as "Christian" is using their public acts of benevolence to draw attention to their "goodness" and thus gain financial support, especially if they are not faithfully preaching the true Gospel of Christ and discipling Christian believers in a truly Biblical manner, their message is clearly false and heretical. Their claims of loving others and loving Christ are shown to be hypocritical and have no real credibility. They are instead presenting nothing more than an evil, counterfeit gospel. They are only drawing attention to and glorifying themselves instead of serving and exalting Jesus, whom they claim to be impersonating and obeying. Through the presentation of a false gospel, such benevolent practices only represent patent heresy and a hypocritical, self-serving lack of love for others. |
|||
|
Tactic #16 - The False Gospel A counterfeit version of the "good news" of Christ The good news of Christ's salvation, or the "gospel", is the news God has given to mankind in the Bible about His provision for our eternal salvation through His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ. This is the news that tells us how we can escape our rightly-deserved doom of eternal damnation, destruction, and death by placing complete faith in Jesus and therefore receiving the eternal life He has bought for us through His blood sacrifice. To read a detailed explanation of the true gospel, please refer to the article section entitled "7 - Essential Biblical doctrines -- Doctrines necessary for eternal salvation". The true gospel of Christ explained in the Bible covers the following areas of essential truth:
Tragically, the modern church is often guilty of preaching a false gospel, and this counterfeit message has eternally destructive consequences both for those who preach it and for those who believe it. The false gospel is a message that tells people they are approved by God, or they will be approved by God, without telling them the truth about what Christ's salvation actually is, why people need His salvation, how God has provided for us to be saved through His Son, or how to actually receive His salvation. The counterfeit gospel lulls the listener into a false sense of security by hiding the truth and telling them they are OK, when in fact they are still in a state of eternal condemnation. The false gospel is heretical and damnable. It is evil and deceptive, and its counterfeit message causes people to falsely believe they belong to Christ and are saved, and it also blasphemes the value of Jesus' blood sacrifice. A false gospel eternally damns humans souls. A counterfeit version of the good news of Christ is overly simplistic, appeals to human thinking and personal desires, and omits many Scriptural truths about eternal salvation and the need for it. Its deceptive message includes one or more of the following false beliefs:
If any religious teaching promotes or tolerates one or more of these false beliefs and yet claims to be telling others about the good news of Christ, its message is actually a false, heretical gospel. If a church omits regular preaching of the true gospel of Christ, and instead assumes that everyone in the church is a believer, it is preaching a false gospel. If a Christian teacher avoids or makes light of the issue of personal sin and mankind's depraved sinful condition, their message presents a false gospel. If anyone teaching about God distorts God's own description of our need for salvation and His only manner of saving us, their message is deceptive and heretical. |
|
It is essential to understand that heretical teaching does not necessarily need to contradict the most visible Biblical doctrines, such as the identity of Christ, the trinity, the virgin birth, etc., in order to earn the label of "heresy". It only needs to have the overall effect of refocusing the learner's trust and basis of confidence by distracting them from the true God and the true Gospel of the Bible and shifting their loyalty toward the particular brand of teaching or toward the popular teacher. If the teaching can be shown to have the overall effect of displacing attention away from God's Word and thereby effectively discouraging the listener from getting the truth directly from the source, the Bible itself, it is a heretical teaching. False Christian teaching does not need to blatantly and obviously lie to achieve its aims. It only needs to shift our allegiance and attention away from the Bible to rightly deserve the label of "heresy". It only needs to distract us and effectively appeal to our selfish desires in order for its message to be accepted. Then the yeast can quietly set about its task of corrupting the entire loaf over time, remaining safely undetected until the serious damage is done.
It is interesting and instructive to observe that, upon close inspection, some of the more popular and well-respected "Bible" teachers influencing the modern church are using many, if not all, of the above-mentioned heretical teaching tactics. Careful study of their teachings readily reveals this fact. They presumably are using these methods to obtain and maintain a loyal following, public popularity, broad influence, or possibly their financial success. Such motives are just a presumption of course, but we feel they are the most reasonable presumptions, since the content of much modern church teaching materials is regularly in violation of various principles and explicit statements in the Bible, as seen through the ongoing use of these false teaching tactics.
We sincerely hope you will benefit from these Scripturally-based rules of thumb about detecting false teachings when making a choice about who to listen to or about what books or teaching materials to use that come from popular, modern authors. There are some very good ones out there, but tragically there are also some very bad ones. We must trust the Spirit of Christ, by both studying and obeying His Holy Word, to lead us "into all truth". So we must make wise and knowledgeable decisions, based on His leading us through Scriptural directives and principles, about which teaching materials to use in the church and in our personal lives and families. Although the wolves are certainly out there, thank God that there are also good shepherds who are truly led by the supreme Good Shepherd. We must trust and cling to Him and to His Word alone in this ongoing and God-mandated quest for truth and authentic spiritual growth in Christ.
|
| Trends in the modern church clearly indicate that people are certainly following Christian leaders but are not necessarily following Christ. |
We have recently observed, especially among Christians, either increasing interest in or "blindness" to religious teaching that is false, so called because it seriously deviates from the basic principles and explicitly stated doctrines of the Bible. The deviant messages have sometimes departed from the orthodox mainstream of Biblical teaching on doctrines concerning Jesus Christ or His clear gospel message. But most seriously, false doctrines are shown to have the long-term effect of questioning the inerrancy, authority, or relevance of the Bible itself. Many modern, deviant messages have been folded into a much more subtle, palatable, and often unrecognizable blend of truth and heresy than we have observed in the past, and so they are deceiving many people. These recent forms of deception are apparently much more effective than the techniques of the previous, more "obvious" heresies in their ability to influence the masses of believers within the Church of Jesus Christ.
Such false popular teaching entices people to follow the teacher and detracts from Christ and the Bible, primarily by either appealing to peoples' desire for personal fulfillment or by capitalizing on their deep need to know and serve God, coupled with their ignorance of the truths in the Bible. These teachers misuse the Bible by either misquoting it or by citing unreliable translations or inaccurate Bible paraphrases in order to bolster their arguments. They commonly employ modern "pop" psychological terms and principles, or they use sophisticated and abstract religious jargon, blending it all together with some degree of Scriptural truths, and delivering it in a new, dynamic, and attractive message. And they often heavily quote from other religious leaders or teachers, placing relatively minor emphasis on the Bible itself in the process. These deceptive techniques are used in order to present to the Christian a supposedly authoritative and logical argument for the doctrines being promoted.
An especially disturbing trend is that some well-established and previously trusted Christian teachers and authors have begun to espouse more mystical or psychology-based movements, and such leaders are beginning to weave these man-made philosophies and traditions into their Bible teaching. In many cases, their previous teaching has been regarded as trustworthy. Such gradual and fundamental shifts away from the truth are especially troubling, but these departures from the faith have already been foretold in the Scripture. So while we should be dismayed by such "falling away", we should not be surprised. To those Christians who may be less discerning or less knowledgeable, however good their learning intentions may be, such counterfeit messages can often appear to be Scripturally-based and thus present a false aura of credibility and attractiveness. These methods of subtle deception are of late amazingly and tragically common among many modern "Bible" teachers and authors. Again, such heresy and falling away from the faith has already been explicitly predicted by the Bible to be a commonplace occurrence in the last days before the return of Christ to the earth. So while we must refute and resist this trend toward apostasy, we should not be surprised when we see it.
|
Modern, counterfeit Christian teachings make appealing offers such as acceptance by or special connection to God, spiritual power, personal happiness, health, wealth, job success, influence with others, love, excitement or adventure, "deep" or mysterious knowledge, transcendence above the mundane, coping with life problems, or other seemingly attractive benefits. In the process of offering these promises, false church leaders have adopted the effective marketing technique of repeating their own specially-branded terminologies and doctrinal mantras. They provide some sort of formula for gaining these wonderful insights, which usually involve the exercise of a special brand of "faith", "spirituality", or particular practices. And these pseudo-Christian gurus expect their followers to implicitly accept their teachings and unquestioningly trust in their integrity. Of course, these teachers are very well paid for exercising their specially-packaged brand of spiritual leadership, either directly or through their "ministry", "church", or publishing company. And let's not forget that many leaders have essentially become "Christian superstars" in the process of building their large and successful ministries. Trends in the modern church clearly indicate that people are certainly following Christian leaders but are not necessarily following Christ.
One very subtle and therefore dangerous enticement that many "enlightened" and modernized church leaders employ to lure people to follow their doctrines is their dynamic, bold leadership toward a supposedly new vision of the church's fulfillment of Christ's commandment for global discipleship. This lure is also coupled with a promise of personal belonging and acceptance through involvement in small, home fellowship groups that reinforce the doctrines at a personal level. Such teachings appeal to people's desire for personal acceptance, and they also appeal to a strong urge to be part of something big and grand, something of broad global scope, a vision of having a significant impact on the world at large in a way that is proven to supposedly "work". They present the past methods of the church as being obsolete and their new techniques as being the only effective means for evangelizing the 21st century world. They offer a new model for global discipleship, a new way for the church to fit into contemporary society to achieve this apparently lofty and supposedly righteous goal. The teachers of these new doctrines therefore essentially put themselves forward as modern-day "apostles". But in fact, these new paradigms for spiritual transformation actually require Christians to discard key doctrines of the Bible in order to be effective, and they follow the wisdom of men instead of the express revelation of God. Most seriously of all, these new, presumably progressive doctrines have the overall effect of undermining the authority of the Bible and therefore questioning the very character of God.
|
Jesus warned us in Matthew 16:5,6 to avoid the false teaching of religious leaders who speak for their own interests and not for God. In the end, we must truly be following Christ by following Christian leaders, since Christ and His Word are the only source of real and reliable eternal truth. As He said in John 10:1, "I tell you the truth, the man who does not enter the sheep pen by the gate, but climbs in by some other way, is a thief and a robber." To help Christians recognize counterfeit teaching, we will also concentrate on helping them know the "real thing". We will continue to add information about the Bible and about Christ to this website. We will provide helpful links for anyone interested in the Bible, Christian teaching, or other Christian ministries and services. In addition to our presentation of the truth by discussing Christ and the Bible, from time to time we will also publish information on and critiques of the questionable teachings. The Christian believer can best be ready to recognize what is false by first coming to know the Truth better (i.e. to know God and His Word through Christ). So we will devote many of our energies and resources to talking about the "real thing".
We would urge Christians to carefully read and study the account in the Biblical book of Genesis that records how the serpent (Satan) first successfully tempted mankind (Adam and Eve) to question God and rebel against His commandment, exert their own independence, and break their close fellowship with Him. This separation introduced sin, misery, and death into the world for all of human history. The Devil appeals to our selfish desires and our trust in our own understanding. And he also appeals to our personal loyalties to others to tempt us to ignore our responsibility of correcting and warning each other as a part of building each Christian up in their "most holy faith". In the process, Satan very cleverly undermines God's authority and character. Satan has not changed his tactics -- he is doing exactly the same thing today in a contemporary form, and he continues to especially target God's children. To counter Satan's attacks against both God's holy sovereignty and against humanity, the church of Jesus Christ should also not change its tactics -- staunchly standing on our firm belief in and stubbornly remaining committed to a simple obedience to God's Holy Word and standing together in a loving, Biblically-based unity of mind, spirit, activity, and purpose.
|
15 -
Conclusion |
Please visit the various sections on this website. We would encourage you to look at two sections in particular -- the Links to Truth page (http://risingbread.org/Links/LinksToTruth.htm) and the Questionable Teachings page (http://risingbread.org/Articles/Questionable.htm), which both contain a wealth of good resources. We hope the information here will help you in your search for reliable, practical truth, eternal purpose, and especially for Christ Himself. This "intangible" search for God, truth, and meaning is actually the most important aspect of human life. This search for truth is satisfied only in Jesus Christ and in God's only explicit and reliable written record of truth to mankind -- the Bible.
We sincerely hope to help you fulfill God's will for your salvation and holiness, accomplish His plan for you as His child to achieve good works for His glory and His eternal kingdom, and come to know Him better in the process.
| "Attending church regularly and doing 'Christian' things does not make you any more of a true believer in Christ than sitting in a garage regularly and making car noises will turn you into an automobile." |
NOTE: We currently do not accept financial contributions, nor do we have any plans to do so in the foreseeable future, as this effort is privately funded through our own personal incomes. If it becomes clear to us at some point that we need to accept private donations to continue this ministry effectively, we will provide that option on this website.
Copyright © 2008-2010 Rising Bread Ministries. All Rights Reserved.